JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣144例的疗效观察

中国真菌学杂志,2016,11(04):232-234+239 【摘要】目的观察JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣的疗效。方法选取体股癣32例,足癣78例,手癣 34例,将JUC长效抗菌材料喷洒患处和周围所有皮肤.3次/d,疗程4周;同时喷洒患者的鞋.袜、毛巾,衣裤等,l次/d,3个月后进行复发评定。结果4周后,临床总有效率为95.83%,真菌学有效率为72.92%。体股癣、足癣和手癣的有效率分别为93.75%、96.15%和97.06%。对138例痊愈患者随访3个月,复发3例,复发率为3.13%。结论JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣疗效满意,不良反应少,复发率低。
  • 发布作者: 韦士才
  • 发布日期: 2016
  • 关键词: JUC长效抗菌材料;体癣;股癣;手癣﹔;足癣
足癣

JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣144例的疗效观察

韦士才

(南京市浦口医院皮肤科,南京210031)

【摘要】目的观察JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣的疗效。方法选取体股癣32,足癣78,手癣 34,JUC长效抗菌材料喷洒患处和周围所有皮肤.3/d,疗程4;同时喷洒患者的鞋.袜、毛巾,衣裤等,l/d,3个月后进行复发评定。结果4周后,临床总有效率为95.83%,真菌学有效率为72.92%。体股癣、足癣和手癣的有效率分别为93.75%96.15%97.06%。对138例痊愈患者随访3个月,复发3,复发率为3.13%。结论JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣疗效满意,不良反应少,复发率低。

【关键词】JUC长效抗菌材料;体癣;股癣;手癣﹔;足癣

【中图分类号】R 756.2 R 756.3【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1673-3827(2016)11-0232-03

A clinical study on JUC long-acting antimicrobial material for tinea corporis and cruris , manus and pedistreatment

wEI Shi-cai

( De partment of Dermatology,Nanjing Pukou Hosiptal ,Nanjing 210031)

AbstractObjective To observe the treatment effect of JUC long-acting antimicrobial material on tinea corporis , manusand pedis.MethodsThirty-two tinea corporis and cruris,78 tinea pedis and 34 tinea manus were enrolled in the study.Allparticipants were treated with JUC long-acting antimicrobial material spray,three times per day and the treatment lasted for4 weeks.Meanwhile ,all participants shoes , socks and towels and clothes were also sprayed with JUC long-acting antimicrobialmaterial,one time per day.Results At the end of treatment,the total clinical cure rate was 95.83%(138 of 144) and the my-cology clearance was 72.92% (105 0f 144).The cure rates of tinea corporis and cruris, tinea pedis and tinea manus were 93.75%,96.15% and 97.06% separately.After three months of treatment, recurrence rate was 3.13% (3 of 138).ConclusionsTreating tinea corporis and cruris, tinea pedis and tinea manus with JUC long-acting antimicrobial material is safe, effectiveand able to decrease the recurrence.

Key wordsJUC long-acting antimicrobial material; tinea corporis ; tinea cruris; tinea manus; tinea pedis

[Chin J Mycol,2016,11(4):232-234]

浅部真菌病是由皮肤癣菌感染引起的皮肤、毛发和甲的感染性疾病,其中皮肤科门诊最常见的是体股癣和手足癣。由于其发病率和复发率都比较高,对患者健康和生活质量产生非常严重的影响1。目前临床治疗以局部外用及口服抗真菌药为主,虽然具有肯定的疗效,但由于临床上抗真菌药物的大量使用,真菌的耐药性也迅速发展[2。因此,在浅部真菌病防治药物或措施的研发和评价过程中,充分考虑真菌耐药性问题显得尤为重要。为探寻新的有效的治疗浅部真菌病.减少复发的新方法,本研究通过在我院2014 112月间应用JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣,观察其临床疗效和治疗后复发率,本研究取得了较好疗效,现报告如下。

材料与方法

1.1临床资料

本试验分为三个独立试验进行研究。

试验1选取体股癣患者35,其中男性19,女性16,年龄1845,病程1~15 a,其中脱落⒉例,32例体股癣患者完成研究并纳入分析。

试验2选取足癣患者80,其中男性58例,女性22,年龄18~55,病程1~20 a,其中脱落1,剔除1,78例足癣患者完成研究并纳入分析。

试验3选取手癣患者35,其中男性16,女性19,年龄1855,病程1~16 a,其中脱落1,34例足癣患者完成研究并纳入分析。三组患者真菌学检查均星阳性。

入选标准[36]:临床症状和体征及真菌学检测均确诊为体股癣或手足癣的患者;1个月内未服用过抗真菌药,半个月内未外用过抗真菌药;本人愿意配合完成治疗。凡对本次试验中试验试剂中有效成分铵盐过敏者,糖尿病、严重心肺肾病者,伴有严重湿疹或感染者均不纳人本试验;凡不按规定用药,不按时复诊者剔除。年龄在20~52岁之间。研究者与每位患者进行谈话,患者在充分理解的基础上,签订知情同意书。本研究通过南京市浦口医院伦理审查委员会批准后进行。

1.2治疗

手癣或足癣的患者喷洒JUC长效抗菌材料前,用热水浸泡患处皮肤约10 min,体股癣患者用热毛巾湿敷10 min,待水疱等角质化皮肤松软以便JUC长效抗菌材料更充分地和患处接触,有水拖或脓疱者需用无菌镊子将疱皮挑破,有分泌物者,用水清洗。

清洁患处后,采用JUC长效抗菌材料(南京神奇科技开发有限公司)距离患处及周围皮肤15cm喷洒,均匀覆盖患处及周围皮肤,3/d,14 d,1/d;同时喷洒患者的鞋、袜、毛巾﹑衣裤等,1/d,疗程4周。

1.3观察指标

治疗第7,14,28天分别评分及进行真菌镜检,7.1428天进行疗效评定;28天进行真菌转阴评定;3个月后进行复发评定。

病原学检测方法用钝刀片刮去患处边缘鳞屑或水疱壁,加滴10%氢氧化钾溶液制片,光镜下观察﹐见有分隔和分支的透明菌丝或关节孢子即为阳性。

症状与体征评价根据卫生部1993年颁布的《皮肤病外用药物临床研究指导原则》治疗浅部真菌病药物的疗效判断标准进行疗效评定[7

疗效分为痊愈﹑显效﹑有效、无效四级,根据皮疹情况﹐自觉症状、真菌镜检及(或)培养结果进行评价。①痊愈:皮疹完全消退,痒感消失,真菌镜检及/或培养阴性。2显效:皮疹消退60%以上。痒感明显减轻,真菌镜检阴性或可见少量破碎,变型的菌丝、孢子,培养阴性。③有效:皮疹消退20%~60%,痒感减轻,真菌镜检及/或培养阳性。④无效:皮疹消退不足20%或继续加重,痒感同前或加剧,真菌镜检及(或)培养阳性。总有效率=(痊愈例数+显效例数+有效例数)÷总例数×100%

2

2.1临床疗效

32例体股癣患者治疗7 d14 d28 d,有效率分别为68.75%87.50%93.75%;78例足癣患者治疗7 d14 d28 d,有效率分别为69.73%79.48%96.15%;34例手癣患者治疗7 d14 d28d,有效率分别为74.71%82.36%97.06%(见表l)

1 JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣、足癣、手癣临床疗效

Tab.1 Clinical effect of JUC Long-acting Antimicrobial Material intreatment of tinea corporis & cruris, pedis and tinea manus

image.png 

 

2.2真菌学疗效评价-

治疗前144例患者真菌学检查均为阳性,治疗28 d后有105例转阴,转阴率72.92%(见表2)2.3不良反应

治疗期间,所有患者均未发现有痛、痒,过敏等

2 JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣真菌学疗效

Tab.2 Mycological effect of JUC Long-acting Antimicrobial Mate-rial in treatment of tinea corporis & cruris, tinea manus and pedis

 

image.png不良反应。2.4复发率

96例痊愈患者进行随访3个月,复发3例,均为足癣,复发率为3.13%

3讨论

体股癣、手足癣主要是由红色毛癣菌、须癣毛癣菌,石膏样小孢子菌,絮状表皮癣菌感染引起,浅部真菌病的治疗目的是清除致病菌,快速消除症状,防止复发。治疗方法主要有3,即局部治疗、系统治疗和二者联合治疗。临床根据致病菌种类、临床分型和患者的基本情况等因素选择不同的治疗方法。目前常用的抗真菌药分为唑类,丙烯胺类,其疗效确切,但长期应用会使真菌耐药性增加,另外致病菌还易定植在鞋.袜上.目前尚无有效去除鞋袜上污染的致病菌的方法。近年来,随着真菌感染率逐渐上升,临床上现有抗菌药在高效低毒.抗真菌谱和耐药性方面评价尚不能令人满意,寻找更安全有效.简单方便的抗真菌方法具有重要临床意义。

JUC长效抗菌材料是一种纳米物理抗菌材料r由有机硅季铵盐和高分子活性喷剂水溶性液体构咸,喷酒在皮肤.黏膜表面以后,可形咸稳定的正电荷网状膜,该膜能够强力吸附带负电的病原微生物,包括细菌、真菌、病毒,从而杀灭病原微生物10-17。魏跃钢等[应用JUC长效抗菌材料治疗足癣,获得与硝酸咪康唑相同的治疗效果,治疗有效率为92.45%。在本研究中,JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣.足癣,手癣的临床有效率分别达到93.75%,96.15%,97.06%,由于体股癣及手癣收集病例数比足癣收集病例数少,虽然有效率的不同不翼备统计学意义,但试验结果有待今后扩大病例数后进行进一步的临床研究;真菌学有效率达72.92%,复发率为3.13%.与目前常用的唑类和丙烯胺类药物疗效相当12。目前局都用药治疗能起到很好的治疗效果,但至少有1/3的足癣患者会复发[0]JUC长效抗菌材料大大降低了足癣的复发率。JUC长效抗菌材料在使用过程中,无需涂抹,只需喷洒,相比传统的外用软音剂使用更加方便.患者更易于按受,其喷洒薏图大于损伤创面,可以有效保护未感染皮肤:其在杀灭患处真菌的同时、也能有效杀灭鞋、裱和毛巾和衣裤上的真菌,可以减少真菌感染在家庭成员间的传播和惠者自身的复发。在前期的研究中发现,JUC长效抗菌材料在有效杀灭细菌、真菌的同时,由于其独特的抗菌机制,不会诱导耐药2。但JUC长效抗菌材料对顽固性体股癣和手足狮的治疗作用和长期的预防效果还有待研究。

外用JUC长效抗菌材料在疗效.依从性,复发性三者之间做到了合理兼顾,为提高足癣的治愈率,降低复发率,降低真菌耐药率提供了新方法。

 

参考文献

[1] Dias MF,Quaresma-Santos Mv ,Eernardes-Filho F,et al.

Update on therapy for superficial mycoses:review articlepart ILJ.An Bras Dermato1,2013,88(5,764-774.

[2] Pereiro Ferreiros MJr.Garcia-Martinez FJ,Alonso-Gonzalez

J.Update on the treatment of superficial mycases[J].ActasDermosifiliogr,2012,103(9);778-783.

中国中西医结合学会皮肤性病专业委员会,中华医学会皮肤性病学分会真菌学组.手癣和足癣的诊疗指南[J.中国真菌学杂志,2012,723;109.

Deva R,Shankaranarayanan P,Cicooli R,et al.Candida albi-cans induces selectively transcriptional activation of cycloox-ygcnasc-2 in HeLa cells : pivotal roles of Toll-like receptors.p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase,and NF-kappa B[J].JImmunol,2003,171(7): 3047-3055.

[5]

Gupta AK,Skinner AR,Cooper EA.Evaluation of the effica-cy of ciclopirox 0.77% gel in the treatment of tinea pedis in-terdigitalis ( dermatophytosis complex ) in a randornizcd,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial[J.Int J Dermanol2005,44(3),590-593.

[6 ]

Gupta AK.Chow M,Daniel CR.et al.Treatments of tinea pe-dis[.Dermatol Clin,2003,2I(期次》:431-462.

[7]中华人民共和国卫生部药政局.f新药(西药)临床研究指导

原则汇编[S].北京:人民卫生出版社.1993.

[8]张雅洁,李青.口服特比泰芬联合外用联苯苄唑乳膏治疗足

癣长期临床研究[J.中国真菌学杂志,2011,664.220-224

.[9王爱平,杨海珍,万喆,.2%硝酸舍他康唑乳膏治疗体股癣和足癣疗效和安全性评价[J]中国真菌学杂志,2006,1c5> ;291-295.

[[10] Zeng Y.Deng R, Yeung B,et al.Application of an antibacteri-al dressing spray in the prevention of post operative infectionin oral cancer patients:A phase 1 clinical trial[J]. African

Journal of Biotechnology , 2008.7(21):3827-3831.

[11] Ng M, Wong C,Chan Y.Comparsion between JUC spray andsilver sulphadiazine cream dressing in the management ofsecond degree burn wounds in an accident and emergency de-partment in HongKong[J], Hong Kong J Emerg Med, 2009 ,10,16(4) :285-286.

[12] Wan K,Ng M, Wong Y.New horion on community acquiredmethicllin resistant Sta ph ylococcus aureus ( CA MRSA )skin and soft tissue infection: nanotechnology antimicrobial

spray[J].Hong Kong J Emerg Med, 2011, 18(6) :432-436.

[13] He W,Ye z, Wang D.Application a antechnology antimiero-bial spray to prevent lower urinary tract ifection:a muli u-rology centers trial [J]. Journal of Translational Medicine,2012,10(1):S14.

[14] Tam B,Chow S.A preliminary report on the ffectiveness ofNanotechnology Anti Microbial Spray Dressing in preventingtenckhoff Catheter Exit sSite Infection[J]. Peritoneal Dialysis

International , 2014 ,34(6) :670-673.

[15] Li W,Ma X.Peng Y,et alpplication of a nano antimicrobialflm t0 prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia:A pilot stud-y[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011, 10( 10): 1926-1931.

[16] Yuen J.Yung J.Medical implications of antimicrobial coatingpolymers - organosilicon quaternary ammonium chloride[J].Mod Chem Appl, 2013,1(3).3

[17] 郭俊岗.龚长根,辛勇,.综合疗法治疗念珠菌性包皮龟头炎36例疗效观察[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2000,29(4):251.

[18] 魏跃钢,闵仲生,陈垒。等."皮肤物理抗菌膜”专利技术治疗足癣的疗效观察[J].皮肤病与性病.2010.6.32(2):31-32.

[19] 王磊.口服特比蔡芬联合外用丙烯胺类药物治疗复发性足癣疗效观察[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2010, 12(227) :66.

[20] Al Hasan M, Fitzgerald SM. Saoudian M,et al. Dermatologyfor the practicing alergist: Tinea pedis and its complications[J].Clin Mol Allergy .2004,2(1);5 -16. .

[21] 陈传俊,于益鹏.孙步梅,等“皮肤物理抗菌膜”与常用抗生素对临床耐药菌株药敏情况的比较研究[J].皮肤病与性病,2011,6,33(3):129-131.

21] Angus RM, Davies ML,Cowan MD, et al. Computed tomo-graphie scanning of the in patients with alergie bronchopul-monary aspergillosis and in asthmatic patients with a posi-

tive skin test to Aspergillus fumigatus [J]. Thorax.200449(6) :586-589,

[22] Tseng YY.Chen CH. Air crescent sign: not always due tofungal ifetion[J.QJM,2015. 108(3) :255-256.

[23] Godoy MC. Visw anathan C, Marchiori E,er al. The reversedhalo sign: update and dilerential diagnosis[J].Br J Radiol. .2012 ,85( 1017):1226-1235.

[24] Primack SL, Hartman TE, er alLPulmonary nodules and the CT halo sign[J] Radiology, 1994,190(2).513-515.

[25] Gaeta M, Blandino A. Scribano E. et al. Computed tomo-graphy halo sign in pulmonary nodules: frequency and diag-nostie value[J].J Thorac Imaging. 199.14(2); 109-113.

[26] Gaeta M, Volta s.Scribano Eret alLAir space pattern in lungmetastasis from edenocarcinoma of the GI tract[J]J Com-put Assist Tomogr , 1996 , 20(2) :300-304.

[27] Godoy MC. Rouse H. Brown JA. et al. Imaging features of pulmonary Kaposi sarcomassociated immune reconstitu-tion syndrome[J].Am J Roentgenol,2007 ,.189<4) :956 965.

[28] King IJ. Padley SP, Wotherspoon AC, et al. PulmonaryMALT lymphoma:imaging findings in 24 cses[J].Eur Ra-diol, 2000, 10(12) :1932- 1938.

[29] Nara M.Sasaki T, Shimura s. et al Dffuse alvelar hemor-rhage caused by lung metastasis o! ovarian angiosarcoma[J].Intern Med, 1996 .35(8) :653-656.

[30] Pandit SA, Fiedler PN, Westcott JL. Primnary angiosarcoma of the lung[J]. Ann Diagn Pathol, 2005.9(5) :302-304.

[31] Ueda T.Hosoki N,Isobe K.et alIifue pulmonary involvement by mycosis fungoides : high- resolution computed tomo-graphy and pathologic findings[J]J Thorac Imaging , 200217(2):157-159.

[32] Woodring JH, Bognar B.CT halo sign in pulmonary metasta-ses from mucinous adenocarcinoma of the pancreas[J]South Med J,2001 .94(4):448 449.

[33] Tomiyama N, Ikezoe J, Miyamoto M,et al.CT halo sign inmetastasis of osteosarcoma[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 1994162 :468.

[34] Horger M. L.engerke C. Pfannenberg C. et al. Significance ofthe "halo" sign for progression and regression of nodularpulmonary amyloidosis: radiographic pathological correla-tion[J].Eur Radiol. 2005.15(9):2037 -2040.

[35]Marten K. Rummeny EJ, Engelke C. The CT halo:a newsign in active pulmonary sarcoidosis[J]. Br J Radiol, 2004.77(924) : 1042-1045.

[36] Felson, B. The mural nodule in cavity opportunistic pulmona-ry aspergillosis[J].Radiology .1982 .143(3):619-622.

[37] Rrcan Tuncel.Pulmonary Air Meniscus Sin[J]. Respiration,1984.46(1);139-144.

[38] Levin EJ.Pulmonary intrcavitary fungus bll[J].Radiology,1956 ,66(1):9-16.

[39] Ji Young Kim.Jung Wan Yoo. Minyoung Oh.et alL.l8F-Flu-oro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission T omography/Computed Tomography findings are different between inva-sive and noninvasive pulmonary asperillosis[J].J Comput Assist Tomogr ,2013.37<4):596-600.

 

 

 

 

2.JUC长效抗菌材料治疗体股癣和手足癣144例的疗效观察.pdf


© 2020 南京神奇科技开发有限公司 版权所有 洁悠神学术中心